IdahoVotes Forum

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to Idaho legislation and public policy.
Welcome to IdahoVotes Forum Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 03-04-2011 8:37 PM by daviwill. 1 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    • admin
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 02-11-2010
    • Posts 53

    2011 House Bill 67 (Allow Supreme Court to enter into a contract for collection of debts)

    Introduced in the House on January 28, 2011

    The vote was 60 in favor, 6 opposed and 4 not voting

    (House Roll Call 0 at House Journal 0)

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 03-04-2011 8:37 PM In reply to

    Re: 2011 House Bill 67 (Allow Supreme Court to enter into a contract for collection of debts)

    The supreme court should always be held as a seperate entity that should not be allowed to enter into contracts. The debts that are owed to the court should be monitored and collected by the body of the state that was setup to do that and that would be congress. If our congressional officials are moving to "pass the  buck" to the supreme court and allow them to setup their own contracts than what is the point of having this body that is supposed to collect debts for the state if they do not want to do it for the court. Next we will see that they will pass the rest of the debt collection off to the exectuive branch of the state and not do that themselves either.

     

    Will Davis

    Idaho Falls

Page 1 of 1 (2 items)